Yayın:
Comparison of Amberlite IR 120 and dolomite's performances for removal of heavy metals

dc.contributor.authorKocaoba, Sevgi
dc.contributor.institutionauthorKOCAOBA, Sevgi
dc.date.accessioned2026-06-27T13:01:50Z
dc.date.issued2007
dc.description.abstractThe presence of heavy metals in the environment is major concern due to their toxicity. Contamination of heavy metals in water supplies has steadily increased over the last years as a result of over population and expansion of industrial activities. A strong cation-exchange resin, Amberlite IR 120 and a natural zeolite, dolomite were used for the removal of lead(II) and cadmium(II). The optimum conditions were determined in a batch system as concentration range was between 5 and 100 mg/L, pH range between 1 and 8, contact time between 5 and 90 min, and the amount of adsorbent was from 0. 1 to 1 g. A constant stirring speed, 2000 rpm, was chosen during all of the experiments. The optimum conditions were found to be a concentration of 20 mg/L, pH of 5, contact time of 60 min and 0.5 g of adsorbent. Also, for investigation of exchange equilibria different amounts of ion exchange resin and dolomite were contacted with a fixed volume and concentration of a heavy metal bearing solutions. Sorption data have been interpreted in terms of Langmuir and Freundlich equations. The effect of adsorption temperature on the heavy metals adsorption onto dolomite was investigated at three different temperatures (20, 40 and 60 degrees C). Thermodynamic parameters were calculated. The results obtained show that the Amberlite IR 120 strong cation-exchange resin and dolomite performed well for the removal of these heavy metals. As a low cost adsorbent, dolomite can preferable for removal of heavy metals from wastewaters. (C) 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.en
dc.description.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.01.037
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.01.037
dc.identifier.eissn1873-3336
dc.identifier.endpage496
dc.identifier.issn0304-3894
dc.identifier.issue1-2
dc.identifier.pubmed17335969
dc.identifier.startpage488
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14981/49222
dc.identifier.volume147
dc.identifier.wos000249136200061
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
dc.relation.ispartofJOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
dc.subjectLead(II)
dc.subjectCadmium(II)
dc.subjection exchange resin
dc.subjectdolomite
dc.subjectadsorption
dc.subjectconservative technologies
dc.subjectAQUEOUS-SOLUTIONS
dc.subjectION-EXCHANGE
dc.subjectNATURAL CLINOPTILOLITE
dc.subjectSYNTHETIC RESIN
dc.subjectPB(II)
dc.subjectBENTONITE
dc.subjectCD(II)
dc.subjectZN(II)
dc.subjectWASTE
dc.subjectEngineering
dc.subjectEnvironmental Sciences & Ecology
dc.titleComparison of Amberlite IR 120 and dolomite's performances for removal of heavy metals
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.import.sourceWOS

Dosyalar

Koleksiyonlar