Yayın:
Reliability of contactless vital sign measurement algorithms for use in drone-based mass casualty triage

dc.contributor.authorTayfur, Ismail
dc.contributor.authorSimsek, Perihan
dc.contributor.authorAkgul, Emine Cansu
dc.contributor.authorAtes, Yusuf Samil
dc.contributor.authorGunduz, Abdulkadir
dc.contributor.authorBal, Mert
dc.contributor.authorUstubioglu, Arda
dc.contributor.authorBayramoglu, Burcu
dc.contributor.authorAltinarik, Selim
dc.contributor.authorRyan, Benjamin
dc.contributor.authorDonahoo, Michael Jeff
dc.contributor.authorKarakoc, Aybuke
dc.date.accessioned2026-06-27T15:33:00Z
dc.date.issued2026
dc.description.abstractIn mass casualty incidents, the demand for healthcare services far exceeds existing capacity, underscoring the importance of triage. This study supports drone-based triage by developing and validating algorithms for non-contact vital sign measurement from drone footage. Heart rate was measured by extracting average frame colour values from RGB videos and applying signal processing. Respiratory rate was obtained by analyzing temperature changes in the nasal region. Body temperature was analyzed based on the maximum temperature values in the forehead region' thermal images. For oxygen saturation measurement, a deep learning model trained with features extracted from thermal images. Thirty-seven participants (mean age: 29.7 +/- 8.45 years; 64.9% male) were simultaneously recorded using a drone-mounted camera and monitored with a standard bedside reference monitor, with seven recordings obtained outdoors and 30 indoors. The videos were analyzed by creating 15-second segments for respiratory rate and 13-second segments for the other parameters, with 1-second shifts. The accuracy rates of the oxygen saturation, body temperature, heart rate, and respiratory rate measurement algorithms were 98.65%, 98.59%, 97.70%, and 85.22%, respectively, for indoor recordings, and 99.60%, 98.48%, 96.85%, and 82.83% for outdoor recordings. The mean differences between the image processing-based and reference measurements for indoor recordings were 1.26% for oxygen saturation, 0.19 degrees C for body temperature, -0.37 breaths/min for respiratory rate, and -0.31 beats/min for heart rate; for outdoor recordings, the corresponding mean differences were 0.34%, 0.27 degrees C, -0.52 breaths/min, and -0.38 beats/min, respectively. The vital sign measurement algorithms demonstrated strong performance and can be successfully integrated into drone-based triage and other remote monitoring systems.en
dc.description.sponsorshipTrkiye Bilimsel ve Teknolojik Arascedil
dc.description.sponsorshiptimath
dc.description.sponsorshiprma Kurumu
dc.description.urihttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-40691-4
dc.identifier.doi10.1038/s41598-026-40691-4
dc.identifier.issn2045-2322
dc.identifier.issue1
dc.identifier.pubmed41807583
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14981/71824
dc.identifier.volume16
dc.identifier.wos001745171800015
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherNATURE PORTFOLIO
dc.relation.ispartofSCIENTIFIC REPORTS
dc.rightsopenAccess
dc.subjectDrone
dc.subjectImage processing
dc.subjectPhotoplethysmography
dc.subjectRemote triage
dc.subjectVital signs
dc.subjectSEGMENTATION
dc.subjectVIDEO
dc.subjectCARE
dc.subjectScience & Technology - Other Topics
dc.titleReliability of contactless vital sign measurement algorithms for use in drone-based mass casualty triage
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.import.sourceWOS

Dosyalar

Koleksiyonlar