Yayın:
Natural gas supply cuts and searching alternatives in Germany: A disaggregated level energy consumption analysis for environmental quality by time series approaches

dc.contributor.authorKartal, Mustafa Tevfik
dc.contributor.authorDepren, Serpil Kilic
dc.contributor.authorAyhan, Fatih
dc.date.accessioned2026-06-27T14:54:26Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.description.abstractBy considering the search for alternatives against Russia's natural gas supply cuts, this study explores the impact and causality of disaggregated level energy consumption indicators on environmental quality. Hence, the study investigates Germany, which is the leading economy in Europe and highly dependent on Russia's natural gas supply, by using carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions as the environment indicator, including annual data from 1970 to 2021, and applying novel time series approaches. In the empirical examination, Granger causality-in-quantiles (GCiQ), quantile-on-quantile regression (QoQR), and multivariate adaptive regression splines (MARS) are applied as base models while quantile regression (QR) and dynamic ordinary least squares (DOLS) are used for robustness. The empirical findings show that (i) there are causal impacts of disaggregated level energy consumption indicators on CO2 emissions; (ii) renewable energy and hydroelectricity consumption have a decreasing impact, whereas natural gas, coal, and oil energy consumption have an increasing impact on CO2 emissions; (iii) although nuclear energy has been discussed as a potential alternative, nuclear energy does not have a significant impact in decreasing CO2 emissions; (iv) natural gas consumption has an interaction with renewable energy, hydroelectricity, and coal energy consumption; (v) the power of disaggregated level energy consumption indicators on CO2 emissions vary according to quantiles, thresholds, and interactions between energy consumption indicators; (iv) alternative models validate robustness of the results obtained. Thus, the results imply that the most appropriate alternative is coal energy consumption in the short-term and renewable energy consumption in the long-term to compensate for Russia's natural gas supply cuts, whereas nuclear energy consumption is not a real alternative for Germany.en
dc.description.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-28959-y
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s11356-023-28959-y
dc.identifier.eissn1614-7499
dc.identifier.endpage93563
dc.identifier.issn0944-1344
dc.identifier.issue41
dc.identifier.pubmed37505390
dc.identifier.startpage93546
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14981/66059
dc.identifier.volume30
dc.identifier.wos001040558700004
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherSPRINGER HEIDELBERG
dc.relation.ispartofENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH
dc.subjectCO2 Emissions
dc.subjectNatural gas
dc.subjectAlternatives
dc.subjectGermany
dc.subjectECONOMIC-GROWTH
dc.subjectKUZNETS CURVE
dc.subjectRENEWABLE ENERGY
dc.subjectOIL CONSUMPTION
dc.subjectDEGRADATION EVIDENCE
dc.subjectCARBON EMISSIONS
dc.subjectNUCLEAR-ENERGY
dc.subjectREAL INCOME
dc.subjectUNIT-ROOT
dc.subjectEnvironmental Sciences & Ecology
dc.titleNatural gas supply cuts and searching alternatives in Germany: A disaggregated level energy consumption analysis for environmental quality by time series approaches
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.import.sourceWOS

Dosyalar

Koleksiyonlar