Yayın:
Coordinate differences between static and kinematic precise point positioning: a different approach in spectral analysis during the 2023 Kahramanmara, s earthquake

dc.contributor.authorKaratay, Secil
dc.contributor.authorErken, Faruk
dc.contributor.authorPirti, Atinc
dc.contributor.authorArikan, Feza
dc.date.accessioned2026-06-27T15:31:59Z
dc.date.issued2026
dc.description.abstractThis study investigates effects of static versus kinematic CSRS-PPP processing on coordinate differences (Du Dk Dh) during the 2023 Kahramanmaras, earthquake sequence in Turkiye. GNSS data from TNPGN-Active stations MAR1 and ANTE are analyzed across 10 pre-seismic days (January 28-February 6, 2023) using two approaches: daily spectral analysis with median filtering, detrending and FFT and combined analysis of concatenated time series. Results show processing modes produce discrepancies exceeding 35 % in dominant frequency characteristics and 68 % in spectral variance. We observe a counterintuitive distance paradox: ANTE station exhibits 87.5 % higher baseline frequency variability despite being 46 % farther from the epicenter than MAR1. Statistical analysis (p < 0.001) confirms these differences represent fundamental measurement uncertainties. The height component consistently shows highest processing sensitivity (variance ratios approximate to 2.67), while horizontal components show ratios of 2.2-2.7. During pre-seismic periods, MAR1 demonstrates frequency drift rates of 0.017 mHz/day and ANTE 0.025 mHz/day, suggesting coupling between preparatory earthquake processes and GNSS stability mechanisms. Spectral coherence analysis distinguishes geomagnetically quiet (0.75-0.85), disturbed (0.40-0.50) and pre-seismic (0.55-0.65) conditions, enabling separation of earthquake-related signals from atmospheric artifacts. (c) 2025 COSPAR. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights are reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.en
dc.description.sponsorshipTUBITAK EEEAG Grant [124E027]
dc.description.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2025.12.036
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.asr.2025.12.036
dc.identifier.eissn1879-1948
dc.identifier.endpage4681
dc.identifier.issn0273-1177
dc.identifier.issue4
dc.identifier.startpage4663
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14981/71621
dc.identifier.volume77
dc.identifier.wos001684061300001
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherELSEVIER SCI LTD
dc.relation.ispartofADVANCES IN SPACE RESEARCH
dc.subjectPrecise point positioning
dc.subjectStatic vs kinematic processing
dc.subjectSpectral analysis
dc.subjectPre-seismic detection
dc.subjectGNSS monitoring
dc.subjectEarthquake precursors
dc.subjectGeodetic seismology
dc.subjectGPS
dc.subjectGNSS
dc.subjectCONSTRAINTS
dc.subjectSLIP
dc.subjectEngineering
dc.subjectAstronomy & Astrophysics
dc.subjectGeology
dc.subjectMeteorology & Atmospheric Sciences
dc.titleCoordinate differences between static and kinematic precise point positioning: a different approach in spectral analysis during the 2023 Kahramanmara, s earthquake
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.import.sourceWOS

Dosyalar

Koleksiyonlar