Yayın: Coordinate differences between static and kinematic precise point positioning: a different approach in spectral analysis during the 2023 Kahramanmara, s earthquake
| dc.contributor.author | Karatay, Secil | |
| dc.contributor.author | Erken, Faruk | |
| dc.contributor.author | Pirti, Atinc | |
| dc.contributor.author | Arikan, Feza | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-06-27T15:31:59Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2026 | |
| dc.description.abstract | This study investigates effects of static versus kinematic CSRS-PPP processing on coordinate differences (Du Dk Dh) during the 2023 Kahramanmaras, earthquake sequence in Turkiye. GNSS data from TNPGN-Active stations MAR1 and ANTE are analyzed across 10 pre-seismic days (January 28-February 6, 2023) using two approaches: daily spectral analysis with median filtering, detrending and FFT and combined analysis of concatenated time series. Results show processing modes produce discrepancies exceeding 35 % in dominant frequency characteristics and 68 % in spectral variance. We observe a counterintuitive distance paradox: ANTE station exhibits 87.5 % higher baseline frequency variability despite being 46 % farther from the epicenter than MAR1. Statistical analysis (p < 0.001) confirms these differences represent fundamental measurement uncertainties. The height component consistently shows highest processing sensitivity (variance ratios approximate to 2.67), while horizontal components show ratios of 2.2-2.7. During pre-seismic periods, MAR1 demonstrates frequency drift rates of 0.017 mHz/day and ANTE 0.025 mHz/day, suggesting coupling between preparatory earthquake processes and GNSS stability mechanisms. Spectral coherence analysis distinguishes geomagnetically quiet (0.75-0.85), disturbed (0.40-0.50) and pre-seismic (0.55-0.65) conditions, enabling separation of earthquake-related signals from atmospheric artifacts. (c) 2025 COSPAR. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights are reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies. | en |
| dc.description.sponsorship | TUBITAK EEEAG Grant [124E027] | |
| dc.description.uri | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2025.12.036 | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.asr.2025.12.036 | |
| dc.identifier.eissn | 1879-1948 | |
| dc.identifier.endpage | 4681 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 0273-1177 | |
| dc.identifier.issue | 4 | |
| dc.identifier.startpage | 4663 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14981/71621 | |
| dc.identifier.volume | 77 | |
| dc.identifier.wos | 001684061300001 | |
| dc.language.iso | eng | |
| dc.publisher | ELSEVIER SCI LTD | |
| dc.relation.ispartof | ADVANCES IN SPACE RESEARCH | |
| dc.subject | Precise point positioning | |
| dc.subject | Static vs kinematic processing | |
| dc.subject | Spectral analysis | |
| dc.subject | Pre-seismic detection | |
| dc.subject | GNSS monitoring | |
| dc.subject | Earthquake precursors | |
| dc.subject | Geodetic seismology | |
| dc.subject | GPS | |
| dc.subject | GNSS | |
| dc.subject | CONSTRAINTS | |
| dc.subject | SLIP | |
| dc.subject | Engineering | |
| dc.subject | Astronomy & Astrophysics | |
| dc.subject | Geology | |
| dc.subject | Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences | |
| dc.title | Coordinate differences between static and kinematic precise point positioning: a different approach in spectral analysis during the 2023 Kahramanmara, s earthquake | |
| dc.type | Article | |
| dspace.entity.type | Publication | |
| local.import.source | WOS |