Yayın:
COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT FUSION ALGORITHMS IN URBAN AND AGRICULTURAL AREAS USING SAR (PALSAR AND RADARSAT) AND OPTICAL (SPOT) IMAGES

dc.contributor.authorAbdikan, Saygin
dc.contributor.authorSanli, Fusun Balik
dc.contributor.institutionauthorBALIK ŞANLI, Fusun
dc.date.accessioned2026-06-27T13:21:35Z
dc.date.issued2012
dc.description.abstractImage fusion techniques of remote sensing data are formal frameworks for merging and using images originating from different sources. This research investigates the quality assessment of Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) data fusion with optical imagery. Two different SAR data from different sensors namely RADARSAT-1 and PALSAR were fused with SPOT-2 data. Both SAR data have the same resolutions and polarisations; however images were gathered in different frequencies as C band and L band respectively. This paper contributes to the comparative evaluation of fused data for understanding the performance of implemented image fusion algorithms such as Ehlers, IHS (Intensity-Hue-Saturation), HPF (High Pass Frequency), two dimensional DWT (Discrete Wavelet Transformation), and PCA (Principal Component Analysis) techniques. Quality assessments of fused images were performed both qualitatively and quantitatively. For the statistical analysis; bias, correlation coefficient (CC), difference in variance (DIV), standard deviation difference (SDD), universal image quality index (UIQI) methods were applied on the fused images. The evaluations were performed by categorizing the test area into two as urban and agricultural. It has been observed that some of the methods have enhanced either the spatial quality or preserved spectral quality of the original SPOT XS image to various degrees while some approaches have introduced distortions. In general we noted that Ehlers' spectral quality is far better than those of the other methods. HPF performs almost best in agricultural areas for both SAR images.en
dc.description.urihttps://doi.org/10.1590/s1982-21702012000400001
dc.identifier.doi10.1590/s1982-21702012000400001
dc.identifier.endpage531
dc.identifier.issn1982-2170
dc.identifier.issue4
dc.identifier.startpage509
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14981/52167
dc.identifier.volume18
dc.identifier.wos000313106300001
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherUNIV FEDERAL PARANA, CENTRO POLITECNICO
dc.relation.ispartofBOLETIM DE CIENCIAS GEODESICAS
dc.rightsopenAccess
dc.subjectFusion
dc.subjectPALSAR
dc.subjectRADARSAT-1
dc.subjectSPOT
dc.subjectStatistical Analysis
dc.subjectTRANSFORM METHOD
dc.subjectLANDSAT TM
dc.subjectQUALITY
dc.subjectCLASSIFICATION
dc.subjectGeochemistry & Geophysics
dc.subjectRemote Sensing
dc.titleCOMPARISON OF DIFFERENT FUSION ALGORITHMS IN URBAN AND AGRICULTURAL AREAS USING SAR (PALSAR AND RADARSAT) AND OPTICAL (SPOT) IMAGES
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.import.sourceWOS

Dosyalar

Koleksiyonlar