Yayın:
Design and implementation of PIλDμ controller for ROVs: Thruster modeling, controller parameter optimization, and FPGA realization

dc.contributor.authorErsoy, Hakan
dc.contributor.authorAkgul, Berke
dc.contributor.authorAkpinar, Emin
dc.contributor.authorKartci, Aslihan
dc.contributor.authorAyten, Umut Engin
dc.date.accessioned2026-06-27T15:29:51Z
dc.date.issued2026
dc.description.abstractRemotely operated and autonomous underwater vehicles (ROVs/AUVs) operate in a harsh environment dominated by nonlinear hydrodynamics, strong coupling, and wave-current disturbances. In most of the existing literature, surge-axis motion is still regulated by integer-order PID controllers that are tuned either heuristically or via single-scenario optimization. Such designs often exhibit limited robustness: their performance degrades significantly under severe noise, targeted wave excitation, or time-varying operational profiles. These limitations motivate the use of fractional-order control and more systematic tuning procedures. This paper investigates fractional-order (PID mu)-D-lambda (FOPID) controllers for surge control and compares two popular meta-heuristics, Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) and Differential Evolution Algorithm (DEA), in comparison with classical PID. A fourth-order surge plant model is first obtained via system identification of experimental data from a BlueRobotics T200 thruster. Then, PSO and DEA are used to tune both PID and (PID mu)-D-lambda parameters over a multi-scenario cost function that combines step-response quality, disturbance rejection, and control effort. The resulting controllers are evaluated under four increasingly demanding tests: noiseless step tracking, severe white-noise excitation, sinusoidal storm disturbance, and a final scenario with time-varying set-points under the same storm condition. Across all 16 scalar performance metrics (IAE, ISE, and, ITAE over four tests), the DEA-tuned (PID mu)-D-lambda achieves the best value in 12 cases, consistently outperforming both PID designs and the PSO-based (PID mu)-D-lambda. In the most demanding final test (multi-level reference + storm), it reduces the integral time-weighted absolute error ITAE from 0.1065 (best PID) to 0.0893, i.e., by approximately 16%, while preserving competitive control effort. These results provide quantitative evidence that DEA-tuned (PID mu)-D-lambda offers a more robust and energy-aware solution for single-axis surge control in ROV/AUV applications.en
dc.description.sponsorshipScientific and Technological Research Council of Turkiye (TUBIdot
dc.description.sponsorshipTAK)
dc.description.sponsorshipDepartment of Science Fellowships [121C126, 2232-B]
dc.description.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jestch.2025.102261
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jestch.2025.102261
dc.identifier.issn2215-0986
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14981/71185
dc.identifier.volume73
dc.identifier.wos001650566800001
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherELSEVIER - DIVISION REED ELSEVIER INDIA PVT LTD
dc.relation.ispartofENGINEERING SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL-JESTECH
dc.rightsopenAccess
dc.subjectDifferential evolution algorithm
dc.subjectFPGA
dc.subjectFractional-order calculus
dc.subjectPID
dc.subject(PID mu)-D-lambda
dc.subjectROV
dc.subjectMULTIOBJECTIVE OPTIMIZATION
dc.subjectTRAJECTORY TRACKING
dc.subjectUNDERWATER VEHICLE
dc.subjectEngineering
dc.titleDesign and implementation of PIλDμ controller for ROVs: Thruster modeling, controller parameter optimization, and FPGA realization
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.import.sourceWOS

Dosyalar

Koleksiyonlar