Yayın:
Reasons for Performance Differences among ISO 9001:2015-Certified Construction Companies in the Perspective of TQM Elements

dc.contributor.authorOkudan, Ozan
dc.contributor.authorBudayan, Cenk
dc.date.accessioned2026-06-27T14:36:20Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.description.abstractAlthough some studies identified positive effects of ISO certification on company performance, some studies proposed that the ISO 9000 certification does not guarantee high performance. To understand the reasons for performance differences between ISO-certified companies, these two assessments should be examined. In this way, ISO-certified companies can use the certification to improve their performance. Integrating both ISO 9000 certification and total quality management (TQM) is considered a vital factor for increasing the company performance. Therefore, TQM can be a crucial complement to ISO certification. One reason for the performance difference among ISO-certified companies may stem from ISO 9000-certified companies' following the ISO 9000 standards and applying TQM elements concurrently, which improves the performance, whereas other companies still rely solely on ISO 9000. However, this strategy does not provide the expected improvements to achieve high performance. This study investigated the reasons for performance variances among ISO 9000-certified companies by considering TQM elements. Forty TQM elements and eight performance metrics were extracted by conducting a literature survey, questionnaire survey, and focus group discussions. Another questionnaire survey was conducted among 65 participants from ISO 9000-certified construction companies. The data were examined by performing a cluster analysis and ANOVA. The analysis revealed that ISO-certified companies should not rely solely on the ISO certification. They should integrate ISO certification and TQM to increase their organizational and operational performance. Furthermore, these companies have deficiencies in encouraging employees to learn how to improve skills. They fall short in developing an environment for on-the-job training, quality data to evaluate supervisors and managers, and quality data to manage quality.en
dc.description.urihttps://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)me.1943-5479.0000952
dc.identifier.doi10.1061/(asce)me.1943-5479.0000952
dc.identifier.eissn1943-5479
dc.identifier.issn0742-597X
dc.identifier.issue5
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14981/62587
dc.identifier.volume37
dc.identifier.wos000683844300015
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherASCE-AMER SOC CIVIL ENGINEERS
dc.relation.ispartofJOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT IN ENGINEERING
dc.subjectISO 9000 certification
dc.subjectTotal quality management
dc.subjectPerformance
dc.subjectConstruction industry
dc.subjectMEASURING ORGANIZATIONAL PERFORMANCE
dc.subjectCRITICAL SUCCESS FACTORS
dc.subjectFINANCIAL PERFORMANCE
dc.subjectISO-9000 CERTIFICATION
dc.subjectBUSINESS PERFORMANCE
dc.subjectFIRM PERFORMANCE
dc.subjectIMPACT
dc.subjectIMPLEMENTATION
dc.subjectINNOVATION
dc.subjectEngineering
dc.titleReasons for Performance Differences among ISO 9001:2015-Certified Construction Companies in the Perspective of TQM Elements
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.import.sourceWOS

Dosyalar

Koleksiyonlar