Yayın:
Head and Neck Imaging with a Dental CBCT Device: Comparison of 360° and 180° Rotation Angles in Effective Dose and Quantitative Image Quality in a Phantom Study Head

dc.contributor.authorAmasya, Hakan
dc.contributor.authorGunay, Osman
dc.contributor.authorKesmezacar, Fatih
dc.contributor.authorKayaokay, Duygu Tuncman
dc.contributor.authorYeyin, Nami
dc.contributor.authorKekec, Eylem
dc.contributor.authorZengin, Tuelin
dc.contributor.authorOrhan, Kaan
dc.contributor.authorKaracam, Songuel cavdar
dc.contributor.authorDemir, Mustafa
dc.date.accessioned2026-06-27T15:21:39Z
dc.date.issued2025
dc.description.abstractObjectives This study aims to investigate the effect of full- and half-rotation angles on patient radiation dose and quantitative image quality in CBCT imaging of the head and neck region.Methods A total of 67 TLDs were used for the dosimetry of 16 different regions in the head and neck slices of the anthropometric phantom. The Hyperion X9 Pro (MyRay, Cefla, Imola, Italy) CBCT device was used with a 90 kV pulsed beam and a 13x16e FOV size. Two separate imaging modes (Regular 360 0 and Quick 180 0) were tested, and the mA was determined by the software. Effective doses (EDs) were calculated using the coefficients recommended by ICRP 103 (2007). For the quantitative image quality tests, three VOIs were manually selected for three separate densities in image slices selected from the mandible, maxilla, and paranasal sinus regions of both volumes separately. Pixel values were averaged, and (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), and uniformity tests were conducted.Results In 360 0, ED was calculated as 1.903 mSv and the highest absorbed dose was found in the oral mucosa (1.566 mSv). In 180 0, ED was calculated as 1.123 mSv and the highest absorbed dose was found in the right temporal squamous region (0.984 mSv). The reduction in ED was found to be 41% for full- and half-rotation angles. Quick/Regular ratios for SNR and CNR were changed between 0.83-0.91.Conclusion The magnitude of reduction in ED was found to be higher than the quantitative image quality; however, the impact of this change on diagnosis should be analyzed according to the imaging purpose.en
dc.description.sponsorshipCefla s.c. (Imola, Italy)
dc.description.urihttps://doi.org/10.2174/0115734056316438241203095215
dc.identifier.doi10.2174/0115734056316438241203095215
dc.identifier.eissn1875-6603
dc.identifier.issn1573-4056
dc.identifier.pubmed40248939
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14981/70184
dc.identifier.volume21
dc.identifier.wos001520634500001
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherBENTHAM SCIENCE PUBL LTD
dc.relation.ispartofCURRENT MEDICAL IMAGING
dc.rightsopenAccess
dc.subjectCone-Beam computed tomography
dc.subjectRadiation
dc.subjectRadiography
dc.subjectDental
dc.subjectContrast-to-noise ratio
dc.subjectSignal-to-noise ratio
dc.subjectBEAM COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY
dc.subjectRadiology, Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging
dc.titleHead and Neck Imaging with a Dental CBCT Device: Comparison of 360° and 180° Rotation Angles in Effective Dose and Quantitative Image Quality in a Phantom Study Head
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.import.sourceWOS

Dosyalar

Koleksiyonlar