Yayın:
Deep Learning for Automated Sewer Defect Detection: Benchmarking YOLO and RT-DETR on the Istanbul Dataset

dc.contributor.authorOgurlu, Mustafa
dc.contributor.authorBayram, Bulent
dc.contributor.authorKulavuz, Bahadir
dc.contributor.authorBakirman, Tolga
dc.date.accessioned2026-06-27T15:23:53Z
dc.date.issued2025
dc.description.abstractThe inspection and maintenance of urban sewer infrastructure remain critical challenges for megacities, where conventional manual inspection approaches are labor-intensive, time-consuming, and prone to human error. Although deep learning has been increasingly applied to sewer inspection, the field lacks both a publicly available large-scale dataset and a systematic evaluation of CNN and transformer-based models on real sewer footage. The primary aim of this study is to systematically evaluate and compare state-of-the-art deep learning architectures for automated sewer defect detection using a newly introduced dataset. We present the Istanbul Sewer Defect Dataset (ISWDS), comprising 13,491 expert-annotated images collected from Istanbul's wastewater network and covering eight defect categories that account for approximately 90% of reported failures. The scientific novelty of this work lies in both the introduction of the ISWDS and the first systematic benchmarking of YOLO (v8/11/12) and RT-DETR (v1/v2) architectures under identical protocols on real sewer inspection footage. Experimental results demonstrate that RT-DETR v2 achieves the best performance (F1: 79.03%, Recall: 81.10%), significantly outperforming the best YOLO variant. While transformer-based architectures excel in detecting partially occluded defects and complex operational conditions, YOLO models provide computational efficiency advantages for resource-constrained deployments. Furthermore, a QGIS-based inspection tool integrating the best-performing models was developed to enable real-time video analysis and automated reporting. Overall, this study highlights the trade-offs between accuracy and efficiency, demonstrating that RT-DETR v2 is most suitable for server-based processing. In contrast, compact YOLO variants are more appropriate for edge deployment.en
dc.description.urihttps://doi.org/10.3390/app152011096
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/app152011096
dc.identifier.eissn2076-3417
dc.identifier.issue20
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14981/70492
dc.identifier.volume15
dc.identifier.wos001602573200001
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherMDPI
dc.relation.ispartofAPPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL
dc.rightsopenAccess
dc.subjectdeep learning
dc.subjectsewer defect detection
dc.subjectobject detection
dc.subjectYOLO
dc.subjectRT-DETR
dc.subjectinfrastructure inspection
dc.subjectCLASSIFICATION
dc.subjectNETWORKS
dc.subjectChemistry
dc.subjectEngineering
dc.subjectMaterials Science
dc.subjectPhysics
dc.titleDeep Learning for Automated Sewer Defect Detection: Benchmarking YOLO and RT-DETR on the Istanbul Dataset
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.import.sourceWOS

Dosyalar

Koleksiyonlar