Yayın:
Exploring the Effectiveness of Dimensionality Reduction Methods for High-Dimensional Turbofan Engine Sensor Data

dc.contributor.authorGunes, Mehmet Samil
dc.date.accessioned2026-06-27T15:36:43Z
dc.date.issued2026
dc.description.abstractThis study presents a systematic comparison of three dimensionality reduction methods namely Principal Component Analysis (PCA), t-Distributed Stochastic Neighbor Embedding (t-SNE), and uniform manifold approximation and projection (UMAP) applied to multivariate turbofan engine sensor data from the NASA C-MAPSS benchmark. The analysis was conducted across three subsets of increasing complexity: FD001 (single operating condition, single-fault mode), FD002 (six operating conditions, single-fault mode), and FD004 (six operating conditions, two fault modes), comprising 20,631, 53,759, and 61,249 observations respectively. For multi-condition subsets, within-condition z-score normalization was applied to prevent inter-condition offsets from masking the degradation signal. Fourteen informative sensor variables were retained following the exclusion of near-constant sensors. Embedding quality was assessed using four complementary metrics: silhouette score (with bootstrap 95% confidence intervals), trustworthiness, continuity, and PCA reconstruction RMSE. A downstream remaining useful life (RUL) prediction task and a hyperparameter sensitivity analysis were also conducted. PCA achieved the best silhouette scores on FD001 (0.4608; 95% CI = [0.447, 0.475]; and FD002) and demonstrated RUL predictive capabilities similar to those of a 14-Dimensional Baseline Model, which supports the ability of PCA to be used as an interpretable tool for analyzing data globally. t-SNE maintained the highest levels of trustworthiness and continuity in preserving local neighborhood relationships among the models tested across each subset. UMAP had the best silhouette score on FD004 (0.4818; 95% CI = [0.463, 0.495]); UMAP also produced confidence intervals that did not overlap with either PCA or t-SNE, thus showing significant statistical differences when compared to these two methods under conditions involving multiple faults. The PCA ranking was consistent across the range of hyperparameter combinations tested (n = 36). The results provide a quantitative, generalizable framework for dimensionality reduction method selection in prognostic health management applications.en
dc.description.urihttps://doi.org/10.3390/app16104610
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/app16104610
dc.identifier.eissn2076-3417
dc.identifier.issue10
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14981/71990
dc.identifier.volume16
dc.identifier.wos001774254800001
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherMDPI
dc.relation.ispartofAPPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL
dc.rightsopenAccess
dc.subjectPCA
dc.subjectdimensionality reduction
dc.subjectt-SNE
dc.subjectUMAP
dc.subjectRUL
dc.subjectChemistry
dc.subjectEngineering
dc.subjectMaterials Science
dc.subjectPhysics
dc.titleExploring the Effectiveness of Dimensionality Reduction Methods for High-Dimensional Turbofan Engine Sensor Data
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.import.sourceWOS

Dosyalar

Koleksiyonlar