Yayın:
Evaluation of volumetric modulated arc therapy technique for cranio-spinal irradiation: A rando - phantom based dosimetric study

dc.contributor.authorGoksel, E. O.
dc.contributor.authorTezcanli, E.
dc.contributor.authorOkutan, M.
dc.contributor.authorBilge, H.
dc.contributor.authorYarar, Y. Yildiz
dc.date.accessioned2026-06-27T14:38:48Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.description.abstractBackground: In this study, clinical advantages and the dosimetric accuracy of volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) technique for cranio-spinal irradiation (CSI) were investigated and compared with field in field (FinF) and intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) techniques. Materials and Methods: The organs at risk (OARs) and planning target volume (PTV) were generated on the RANDO phantom computerized tomography (CT) image series. The dose-volume parameters for PTVs and OARs were compared for three techniques. Furthermore, the dose distribution inside the RANDO phantom was measured with thermoluminescent dosimeter (TLD) for all three techniques. Comparisons were done between measured and calculated doses of field junctions, targets and OARs. Results: FinF failed to obtain an adequate dose distribution for the upper spine (US), while VMAT and IMRT provided good dose coverage for all parts of the PTV. The most homogeneous dose distribution at the field junctions was obtained with the VMAT. Although heart, thyroid, intestine, lung, liver and testicular maximum doses were lower for the VMAT, the mean doses were higher except for the heart and thyroid. The absolute volume receiving prescription dose was significantly lower for the VMAT. The median differences between the TLD measurements and TPS calculations were 0.27% (7.8, -9.7; p=0.394), -0.28% (8.1, -10.7; p=0.322) and 0.33% (8.4, -12; p=0.338) for the FinF, IMRT and VMAT, respectively. These differences were not found statistically significant for the VMAT technique, as were the other two techniques. Conclusion: We conclude that the VMAT technique is the optimal Linac based CSI treatment in regards to dose coverage, dose homogeneity in field junctions and OAR sparing for higher doses. In addition, the VMAT showed dose distribution accuracy as good as the two other techniques in measurements simulating real clinical situations.en
dc.description.sponsorshipYildiz Technical University [2012-01-01-DOP05]
dc.description.urihttps://doi.org/10.18869/acadpub.ijrr.19.3.531
dc.identifier.doi10.18869/acadpub.ijrr.19.3.531
dc.identifier.endpage541
dc.identifier.issn2322-3243
dc.identifier.issue3
dc.identifier.startpage531
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14981/63056
dc.identifier.volume19
dc.identifier.wos000672603500006
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherIJRR-IRANIAN JOURNAL RADIATION RES
dc.relation.ispartofINTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION RESEARCH
dc.subjectCranio-spinal irradiation
dc.subjectVMAT
dc.subjectTLD
dc.subjectRANDO phantom
dc.subjectRADIATION-THERAPY
dc.subjectDOSE DISTRIBUTION
dc.subjectRADIOTHERAPY
dc.subjectPHOTON
dc.subjectIMRT
dc.subjectALGORITHM
dc.subjectCANCER
dc.subjectSUPINE
dc.subjectRISK
dc.subjectVERIFICATION
dc.subjectRadiology, Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging
dc.titleEvaluation of volumetric modulated arc therapy technique for cranio-spinal irradiation: A rando - phantom based dosimetric study
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.import.sourceWOS

Dosyalar

Koleksiyonlar