Yayın:
Treatment of poultry slaughterhouse wastewater using a membrane process, water reuse, and economic analysis

dc.contributor.authorCoskun, Tamer
dc.contributor.authorDebik, Eyup
dc.contributor.authorKabuk, Harun Akif
dc.contributor.authorDemir, Neslihan Manav
dc.contributor.authorBasturk, Irfan
dc.contributor.authorYildirim, Burcu
dc.contributor.authorTemizel, Duygu
dc.contributor.authorKucuk, Seyma
dc.contributor.institutionauthorMANAV DEMİR, Neslihan
dc.date.accessioned2026-06-27T13:47:49Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.description.abstractPoultry slaughterhouse wastewater, which represents one of the most important pollutants in Turkey, is generally treated with conventional biological processes in Turkey and around the world. In this study, poultry slaughterhouse wastewater was treated using laboratory-scale membrane processes, which were substituted for conventional processes. The performances of the membrane processes were investigated in terms of chemical oxygen demand (COD), conductivity, and membrane fluxes. Economic analyses were conducted for several membrane system alternatives. In addition, the alternatives were compared with each other and with conventional economic analysis of the data obtained in this study and data from several previous studies. The membranes used for the membrane processes were AG for reverse osmosis (RO), DK for nanofiltration (NF), and ER for ultrafiltration (UF). The highest COD removal efficiencies were 90% for NF and 97.4% for RO, and the conductivities decreased by 51.7% for NF and 96.6% for RO. When the (UF) was not used, the long-term membrane fluxes of the RO and (NF) sharply decreased, which increased the operation costs of these processes. Therefore, RO and NF without pre-treatment and with UF were not effective for this wastewater. According to the economic analysis results, the operational costs of the RO and NF after UF, the UF alone, and the conventional treatment process were 0.66, 0.70, 0.79, and 1.66$/m(3), respectively. Because the operational cost of the conventional treatment process was 2.5 times greater than RO after pre-treatment with UF, it was deduced that this membrane process combination was a suitable treatment alternative for treating poultry slaughterhouse wastewater.en
dc.description.sponsorshipYildiz Technical University Scientific Research Projects Coordination Department [2011-05-02-GEP03]
dc.description.urihttps://doi.org/10.1080/19443994.2014.999715
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/19443994.2014.999715
dc.identifier.eissn1944-3986
dc.identifier.endpage4951
dc.identifier.issn1944-3994
dc.identifier.issue11
dc.identifier.startpage4944
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14981/54926
dc.identifier.volume57
dc.identifier.wos000368037100019
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherTAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
dc.relation.ispartofDESALINATION AND WATER TREATMENT
dc.subjectPoultry slaughterhouse wastewater
dc.subjectUltrafiltration
dc.subjectNanofiltration
dc.subjectReverse osmosis
dc.subjectEconomic analysis
dc.subjectANAEROBIC SLUDGE
dc.subjectELECTROCOAGULATION METHOD
dc.subjectTREATMENT-PLANT
dc.subjectPRETREATMENT
dc.subjectPERFORMANCE
dc.subjectEFFLUENT
dc.subjectREACTORS
dc.subjectEngineering
dc.subjectWater Resources
dc.titleTreatment of poultry slaughterhouse wastewater using a membrane process, water reuse, and economic analysis
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.import.sourceWOS

Dosyalar

Koleksiyonlar