Yayın:
Classic trend analysis methods' paradoxical results and innovative trend analysis methodology with percentile ranges

dc.contributor.authorBirpinar, Mehmet Emin
dc.contributor.authorKiziloz, Burak
dc.contributor.authorSisman, Eyup
dc.date.accessioned2026-06-27T14:49:22Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.description.abstractIn this study, spatial-temporal monotonic and non-monotonic trends in Assam, India, have been analyzed for annual precipitation data through the classical and innovative trend analysis (ITA) methodology. The results of the ITA method have been presented with percentile (quartile) intervals. Thus, within the scope of this study, piecewise trends (low; 25% categories) have been objectively analyzed and identified. The annual precipitation data that was measured in twenty stations in the Assam region from 1901 to 2002 is used for the analysis. According to the classical Modified Mann-Kendall (MMK) method results, only in one station of twenty stations, there is an increasing trend contrary to the decreasing trends in five stations; on the other hand, there is no trend in fourteen stations. As regards to the classical Sen's slope (SS) method calculation, a method which is frequently used together with the MMK method to calculate trend slopes, there are paradoxical results between the MMK and SS method. For instance, at the Cachar station, while there is not any significant trend according to the MMK methodology, the result of the SS methodology points out the largest decreasing trend magnitude. Also, the MMK and SS results are incompatible for the Hailakandi, Karimganj, Dhemaji, Nagaon, Barpeta, Golaghat, Kokrajhar, and Lakhimpur stations. On the other hand, there is little incompatibility between the results of the ITA and SS methods. Also, comprehensive information regarding piecewise trends has been obtained through the ITA model graphs with a quartile range.en
dc.description.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-023-04449-6
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00704-023-04449-6
dc.identifier.eissn1434-4483
dc.identifier.endpage18
dc.identifier.issn0177-798X
dc.identifier.issue1-2
dc.identifier.startpage1
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14981/65201
dc.identifier.volume153
dc.identifier.wos000974624100001
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherSPRINGER WIEN
dc.relation.ispartofTHEORETICAL AND APPLIED CLIMATOLOGY
dc.subjectTIME-SERIES
dc.subjectRAINFALL
dc.subjectTEMPERATURE
dc.subjectPRECIPITATION
dc.subjectIDENTIFICATION
dc.subjectVARIABILITY
dc.subjectBASIN
dc.subjectRIVER
dc.subjectASSAM
dc.subjectHALF
dc.subjectMeteorology & Atmospheric Sciences
dc.titleClassic trend analysis methods' paradoxical results and innovative trend analysis methodology with percentile ranges
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.import.sourceWOS

Dosyalar

Koleksiyonlar