Yayın:
A comparative analysis of 3D bioprinted gelatin-hyaluronic acid-alginate scaffold and microfracture for the management of osteochondral defects in the rabbit knee joint

dc.contributor.authorAydin, Mahmud
dc.contributor.authorOk, Mesut
dc.contributor.authorCerci, Mehmet Halis
dc.contributor.authorDemirhan, Ramazan
dc.contributor.authorSurucu, Serkan
dc.contributor.authorMahirogullari, Mahir
dc.date.accessioned2026-06-27T15:07:23Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.description.abstractObjectives: This study aims to compare the radiological, biomechanical, and histopathological results of microfracture treatment and osteochondral damage repair treatment with a new scaffold product produced by the three-dimensional (3D) bioprinting method containing gelatin-hyaluronic acid-alginate in rabbits with osteochondral damage. Materials and methods: A new 3D bioprinted scaffold consisting of gelatin, hyaluronic acid, and alginate designed by us was implanted into the osteochondral defect created in the femoral trochlea of 10 rabbits. By randomization, it was determined which side of 10 rabbits would be repaired with a 3D bioprinted scaffold, and microfracture treatment was applied to the other knees of the rabbits. After six months of follow-up, the rabbits were sacrificed. The results of both treatment groups were compared radiologically, biomechanically, and histopathologically. Results: None of the rabbits experienced any complications. The magnetic resonance imaging evaluation showed that all osteochondral defect areas were integrated with healthy cartilage in both groups. There was no significant difference between the groups in the biomechanical load test (p=0.579). No statistically significant difference was detected in the histological examination using the modified Wakitani scores (p=0.731). Conclusion: Our study results showed that 3D bioprinted scaffolds exhibited comparable radiological, biomechanical, and histological properties to the conventional microfracture technique for osteochondral defect treatment.en
dc.description.urihttps://doi.org/10.52312/jdrs.2024.1626
dc.identifier.doi10.52312/jdrs.2024.1626
dc.identifier.eissn2687-4792
dc.identifier.endpage367
dc.identifier.issue2
dc.identifier.pubmed38727116
dc.identifier.startpage361
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14981/68204
dc.identifier.volume35
dc.identifier.wos001189927900001
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherTURKISH JOINT DISEASES FOUNDATION
dc.relation.ispartofJOINT DISEASES AND RELATED SURGERY
dc.rightsopenAccess
dc.subjectBioprinted
dc.subjecthistopathological
dc.subjectmicrofracture
dc.subjectosteochondral defect
dc.subjectscaffold
dc.subjectWakitani score
dc.subjectREPAIR
dc.subjectOrthopedics
dc.subjectSurgery
dc.titleA comparative analysis of 3D bioprinted gelatin-hyaluronic acid-alginate scaffold and microfracture for the management of osteochondral defects in the rabbit knee joint
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.import.sourceWOS

Dosyalar

Koleksiyonlar