Yayın:
Effects of Different Drying Methods on Drying Kinetics, Microstructure, Color, and the Rehydration Ratio of Minced Meat

dc.contributor.authorAksoy, Asli
dc.contributor.authorKarasu, Salih
dc.contributor.authorAkcicek, Alican
dc.contributor.authorKayacan, Selma
dc.date.accessioned2026-06-27T14:17:13Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.description.abstractThis study aimed to investigate the effect of different drying methods, namely ultrasound-assisted vacuum drying (USV), vacuum drying (VD), and freeze-drying (FD), on the drying kinetics and some quality parameters of dried minced meat. In this study, USV was for the first time applied to the drying of minced meat. The USV and VD methods were conducted at 25 degrees C, 35 degrees C, and 45 degrees C. The different drying methods and temperatures significantly affected the drying time (p < 0.05). The USV method showed lower drying times at all temperatures. The rehydration values of the freeze-dried minced meat samples were higher than those obtained by the USV and VD techniques. The samples prepared using USV showed higher rehydration values than the vacuum dried samples for all temperatures. The effects of the different drying techniques and drying conditions on the microstructural properties of the minced meat samples were investigated using scanning electron microscope (SEM). The USV method resulted in higher porosity and a more open structure than the VD method. Total color differences (Delta E) for VD, USV, and FD were 8.27-20.81, 9.58-16.42, and 9.38, respectively, and were significantly affected by the drying methods and temperatures (p < 0.05). Higher drying temperature increased the Delta E value. Peroxide values (PV) significantly increased after the drying process, and samples treated with USV showed lower PV values than the VD treated samples. This study suggests that USV could be used as an alternative drying method for minced meat drying due to lower drying times and higher quality parameters.en
dc.description.urihttps://doi.org/10.3390/foods8060216
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/foods8060216
dc.identifier.eissn2304-8158
dc.identifier.issue6
dc.identifier.pubmed31216705
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14981/58827
dc.identifier.volume8
dc.identifier.wos000477009600038
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherMDPI
dc.relation.ispartofFOODS
dc.rightsopenAccess
dc.subjectultrasound assisted drying
dc.subjectminced meat
dc.subjectSEM
dc.subjectmicrostructural
dc.subjectULTRASOUND PRETREATMENT
dc.subjectANTIOXIDANT ACTIVITY
dc.subjectPHENOLIC CONTENT
dc.subjectQUALITY
dc.subjectDEHYDRATION
dc.subjectTEMPERATURE
dc.subjectMUSHROOMS
dc.subjectBEHAVIOR
dc.subjectSTORAGE
dc.subjectAPPLE
dc.subjectFood Science & Technology
dc.titleEffects of Different Drying Methods on Drying Kinetics, Microstructure, Color, and the Rehydration Ratio of Minced Meat
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.import.sourceWOS

Dosyalar

Koleksiyonlar