Yayın: Investigation of different activation methods in peroxymonosulfate oxidation for the treatment of chemical industry wastewater
| dc.contributor.author | Sagir, Dilan | |
| dc.contributor.author | Ozen, Irem | |
| dc.contributor.author | Cene, Gulay Arslan | |
| dc.contributor.author | Guvenc, Senem Yazici | |
| dc.contributor.author | Can-Guven, Emine | |
| dc.contributor.author | Varank, Gamze | |
| dc.contributor.author | Cifci, Deniz Izlen | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-06-27T15:25:35Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2025 | |
| dc.description.abstract | The chemical industry produces complex and toxic wastewater that is difficult to treat with traditional methods. In a pioneering effort, this study provides the first systematic comparison of peroxymonosulfate (PMS)-based advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) using four distinct activation methods-iron (Fe2+), heat, ultraviolet (UV), and electric current (EC)-for the treatment of this challenging wastewater. The chemical oxygen demand (COD) removal efficiency with a single PMS application was 18.0 %, which increased to 54.2 %, 41.4 %, 51.6 %, and 82.1 % with Fe/PMS, Heat/PMS, UV/PMS, and EC/PMS, respectively. Using the Box-Behnken Design (BBD) to determine optimum conditions, validation experiments yielded COD removal rates of 59.5 % for Fe/PMS, 47.5 % for Heat/PMS, 57 % for UV/PMS, and 91 % for EC/PMS. Additionally, UV254 removal rates were 83.8 %, 78.5 %, 83.0 %, and 94.5 %, respectively. The treatment costs were calculated as 4.66 /kg COD for Fe/PMS, 2.60 /kg COD for Heat/PMS, 2.40 /kg COD for UV/PMS, and 0.43 /kg COD for EC/PMS. Among the methods compared, the EC/PMS system emerged as the most efficient and cost-effective process, achieving a remarkable 91 % COD removal at a minimal cost. These findings confirm that the activator type has a strong impact on the performance of PMS-based AOPs and highlight the utility of BBD in optimizing these processes. | en |
| dc.description.uri | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2025.119861 | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.jece.2025.119861 | |
| dc.identifier.eissn | 2213-3437 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 2213-2929 | |
| dc.identifier.issue | 6 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14981/70840 | |
| dc.identifier.volume | 13 | |
| dc.identifier.wos | 001607314800001 | |
| dc.language.iso | eng | |
| dc.publisher | ELSEVIER SCI LTD | |
| dc.relation.ispartof | JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMICAL ENGINEERING | |
| dc.subject | Advanced oxidation | |
| dc.subject | Chemical industry wastewater | |
| dc.subject | Industrial wastewater treatment | |
| dc.subject | Peroxymonosulfate | |
| dc.subject | Process optimization | |
| dc.subject | ELECTROCHEMICAL ACTIVATION | |
| dc.subject | PERSULFATE OXIDATION | |
| dc.subject | ANTIBIOTIC SULFAMETHOXAZOLE | |
| dc.subject | ENHANCED DEGRADATION | |
| dc.subject | INORGANIC ANIONS | |
| dc.subject | BISPHENOL-A | |
| dc.subject | REMOVAL | |
| dc.subject | SULFATE | |
| dc.subject | ANODE | |
| dc.subject | PEROXYDISULFATE | |
| dc.subject | Engineering | |
| dc.title | Investigation of different activation methods in peroxymonosulfate oxidation for the treatment of chemical industry wastewater | |
| dc.type | Article | |
| dspace.entity.type | Publication | |
| local.import.source | WOS |