Yayın:
Comparison of the antimicrobial effects of zinc titanium and aluminum doped copper oxide nanoparticles produced under the same conditions

dc.contributor.authorYilmaz, Mustafa
dc.contributor.authorAykut, Sehrazat Yaren
dc.contributor.authorErdim, Muhammed Kiyami
dc.contributor.authorBozdogan, Ayseguel Celik
dc.contributor.authorGur, Gunseli Kurt
dc.contributor.authorOruc, Cigdem
dc.date.accessioned2026-06-27T15:24:10Z
dc.date.issued2025
dc.description.abstractThe antibacterial nanoparticles have technological uses in many areas, from wall paint to clothing, from medicine to agriculture. Such copper oxide (CuO) nanoparticles can be easily produced by the sol-gel method. In this study, primarily pure CuO and CuO nanoparticles doped with 4%, 8%, 12%, and 16% zinc, titanium, and aluminum were produced by the sol-gel method. Field Emission Scanning Electron Microscopy (FESEM), Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) and x-ray diffraction (XRD) analyses of all produced nanoparticles were performed. The dimensions of pure CuO nanoparticles are approximately 50 nm, while the doped nanoparticles are approximately 80 nm. Bacterial cultivation was carried out using the nanoparticles that had been converted into tablets, with Escherichia coli and Agrobacterium tumefaciens as the test microorganisms. When disc diffusion test results were evaluated, it was generally observed that doping increased the antibacterial effect compared to pure CuO. The additives providing the antibacterial effect for E. coli caused the inhibition zones to grow at an average rate of Al (27%), Zn (15%), and TiO (6%), respectively. In A. tumefaciens bacteria, an increase was observed in the antibacterial effect inhibition zones with Al and Zn additives, while a decrease was observed with TiO additives. As a result, it was seen that CuO doping increased the antibacterial effect, and the best effect was Al doping. When all data were evaluated, the highest antibacterial effect was achieved with 8% Aluminum additive, resulting in a 34% increase in the inhibition diameter for E. coli and a 37% increase for A. tumefaciens.en
dc.description.urihttps://doi.org/10.1002/jccs.70016
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/jccs.70016
dc.identifier.eissn2192-6549
dc.identifier.endpage475
dc.identifier.issn0009-4536
dc.identifier.issue5
dc.identifier.startpage464
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14981/70552
dc.identifier.volume72
dc.identifier.wos001467123500001
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherWILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
dc.relation.ispartofJOURNAL OF THE CHINESE CHEMICAL SOCIETY
dc.subjectagrobacterium tumefaciens
dc.subjectaluminum doping
dc.subjectantimicrobial activities
dc.subjectCuO nanoparticles
dc.subjectEscherichia coli
dc.subjecttitanium
dc.subjectzinc
dc.subjectSILVER NANOPARTICLES
dc.subjectCUO
dc.subjectNANOCOMPOSITE
dc.subjectBACTERIA
dc.subjectChemistry
dc.titleComparison of the antimicrobial effects of zinc titanium and aluminum doped copper oxide nanoparticles produced under the same conditions
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.import.sourceWOS

Dosyalar

Koleksiyonlar