Yayın:
The effects of cephalexin on fracture healing in a rat femur fracture model

dc.contributor.authorUslu, Muhammed
dc.contributor.authorYilmaz, Bilal
dc.contributor.authorMraja, Hamisi Mwarindano
dc.contributor.authorDasci, Mustafa Fatih
dc.contributor.authorSarac, Elif Yaprak
dc.contributor.authorKucukyildirim, Bedri Onur
dc.contributor.authorGulec, Mehmet Akif
dc.contributor.authorYuksel, Serdar
dc.date.accessioned2026-06-27T14:55:56Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.description.abstractObjectives: The aim of this study was to examine the effects of cephalexin on the fracture union histomorphometrically, radiologically, biomechanically, immunohistochemically, and histopathologically in a rat femur fracture model and to evaluate the effects of the antibiotics to be used in the prophylaxis of fracture infection on the union of the fracture.Materials and methods: A total of 48 male Wistar rats were divided into four groups as two-week control (C2) and cephalexin (CEP2) and four-week control (C4) and cephalexin (CEP4). After establishment of standard fracture model on right femurs, 60 mg/kg/day of cephalexin was applied to CEP2 and CEP4 by oral gavage. Radiological, biomechanical, histopathological, immunohistochemical, and histomorphometric examinations were performed on amputated femurs.Results: Callus volume of CEP4 group significantly increased compared to CEP2 group (p=0.005), while no significant difference was found in the bone mineral density and callus/bone volume among the groups (p>0.05). There was no significant difference in flexural strength between the C4 and CEP4 groups (p=0.093). Histological healing scores increased from Week 2 to Week 4 (p=0.002) and inflammation scores decreased in both control and cephalexin groups (p=0.010 and p=0.008); however, no significant difference was found in healing and inflammation scores (p>0.05). The CD34+ immunoreactivity in the CEP2 group was significantly higher than the C2 group (p=0.029). Collagen type III level was significantly lower in the CEP2 and CEP4 groups compared to the corresponding control groups (p=0.008 and p=0.016, respectively).Conclusion: Cephalexin did not exert any radiological, histopathological, histomorphometric, biomechanical, and immunohistochemical adverse effects on the femoral fracture healing model in rats; however, it showed positive effects on CD34 and Collagen type III levels. Based on these findings, antibiotherapy with cephalexin may be considered as a safe treatment for fracture union.en
dc.description.urihttps://doi.org/10.52312/jdrs.2023.994
dc.identifier.doi10.52312/jdrs.2023.994
dc.identifier.eissn2687-4792
dc.identifier.endpage424
dc.identifier.issue2
dc.identifier.pubmed37462646
dc.identifier.startpage413
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14981/66377
dc.identifier.volume34
dc.identifier.wos000989141300001
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherTURKISH JOINT DISEASES FOUNDATION
dc.relation.ispartofJOINT DISEASES AND RELATED SURGERY
dc.rightsopenAccess
dc.subjectCephalexin
dc.subjectfemur
dc.subjectfracture healing
dc.subjectrat
dc.subjectIN-VIVO
dc.subjectBONE
dc.subjectANTIBIOTICS
dc.subjectINHIBITION
dc.subjectLEVOFLOXACIN
dc.subjectCEFUROXIME
dc.subjectCEFAZOLIN
dc.subjectCELLS
dc.subjectOrthopedics
dc.subjectSurgery
dc.titleThe effects of cephalexin on fracture healing in a rat femur fracture model
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.import.sourceWOS

Dosyalar

Koleksiyonlar