Yayın:
The impacts of governance on environmental pollution in some countries of Middle East and sub-Saharan Africa: the evidence from panel quantile regression and causality

dc.contributor.authorBildirici, Melike
dc.date.accessioned2026-06-27T14:36:56Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.description.abstractGovernance is one of the basic determinants of pollution levels through property rights, the effective judicial system, etc. it is accepted as that bad governance because of inefficient regulatory structures, government bureaucracy, weak law enforcement, etc. support environmental pollution. In this context, in some countries of the Middle East and sub-Saharan Africa, it will be studied the impacts of governance on environmental pollution over the period of 1996-2018 by the panel quantile and Granger causality methods. The countries were selected by considering two different measurements, EPI (2020) index and governance index (2020). According to EPI (2020), these countries have low scores in terms of environmental quality, and in the governance index (2020), they have bad governance scores. In this study, in which panel quantile regression model is used, control variables are included in the model to prevent omitted-variable bias. The results of the analysis determined that the effect of governance on carbon emissions is positive, as well as that the effects of independent variables on CO2 emission are heterogeneous across quantities. Panel quantile regression revealed the evidence of the relation among the environmental pollution, two parameters of governance, FDI, financial development, human development index, and trade openness used as the explanatory variable and determined that government has the greatest positive effect on CO2 emission. On the other hand, by using traditional Granger causality and Dumitrescu-Hurlin causality methods, it was found the evidence of causality among governance and environmental pollution in the context of two parameters of governance. Accordingly, it was determined the evidence of unidirectional causality relation from political governance to environmental pollution and besides from economic governance to environmental pollution. And it was determined the evidence of unidirectional causality from FDI and the other explanatory variables to environmental pollution.en
dc.description.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-15716-2
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s11356-021-15716-2
dc.identifier.eissn1614-7499
dc.identifier.endpage17393
dc.identifier.issn0944-1344
dc.identifier.issue12
dc.identifier.pubmed34665419
dc.identifier.startpage17382
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14981/62698
dc.identifier.volume29
dc.identifier.wos000708824800011
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherSPRINGER HEIDELBERG
dc.relation.ispartofENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH
dc.subjectGovernance
dc.subjectPanel quantile regression
dc.subjectPanel causality test
dc.subjectenvironmental pollution
dc.subjectFOREIGN DIRECT-INVESTMENT
dc.subjectCARBON-DIOXIDE EMISSIONS
dc.subjectLAGRANGE MULTIPLIER TEST
dc.subjectINSTITUTIONAL QUALITY
dc.subjectENERGY-CONSUMPTION
dc.subjectNATURAL-RESOURCES
dc.subjectRENEWABLE ENERGY
dc.subjectERROR-CORRECTION
dc.subjectINFLOWS EVIDENCE
dc.subjectPOLICY FORMATION
dc.subjectEnvironmental Sciences & Ecology
dc.titleThe impacts of governance on environmental pollution in some countries of Middle East and sub-Saharan Africa: the evidence from panel quantile regression and causality
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.import.sourceWOS

Dosyalar

Koleksiyonlar