Yayın:
Anti-tumoural activity of 3D printed fluorohydroxyapatite-polylactic acid scaffolds combined with graphene oxide and doxorubicin

dc.contributor.authorAgsous, Maissa
dc.contributor.authorHafit, Khireddine
dc.contributor.authorYala, Sabeha
dc.contributor.authorOktay, Busra
dc.contributor.authorBingoel, Ayse Betul
dc.contributor.authorSenel, Ilkay
dc.contributor.authorUstundag, Cem Bulent
dc.date.accessioned2026-06-27T15:13:53Z
dc.date.issued2025
dc.description.abstractThis study focuses on the synthesis of fluorohydroxyapatite (FHA), and the realization of scaffolds by 3D printing using polylactic acid (PLA) as polymer and graphene oxide (GO). The synthesis of FHA was carried out by the usual sol-gel method. The realization of the 3D scaffold was achieved with the 3D printing method. Four scaffolds were printed with PLA: the first was made with FHA and PLA (FHA/PLA), the second was made with GO in addition to FHA and PLA (FHA/PLA/GO), and the third and fourth ones were the FHA/PLA and FHA/PLA/GO scaffolds coated with electrosprayed hydrogel solution of doxorubicin (DOX) and polyvinyl alcohol (PVA): FHA/PLA/DOX/PVA and FHA/PLA/GO/DOX/PVA. The FHA and GO powders were characterized using Fourier transform infrared analysis and X-ray diffraction analysis. A dissolution study was carried out with different contents of PVA (2.5%, 3% and 4%) to identify the scaffold with the best drug release profile. The 3% w/w PVA hydrogel solution was the best, so the drug release kinetics and drug release mechanism were studied using the most famous mathematical models: zero-order model, Higuchi's model and Korsmeyer-Peppas model (power law model). The porosity of the 3D printed scaffolds was assessed by SEM and, finally, the cellular response of each scaffold on the viability of CDD human fibroblast cells was evaluated using the 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay. The sol-gel synthesis produces FHA, used in the realization of the scaffolds. The scaffolds have mixed porosity (macropores and micropores) promoting cell adhesion and proliferation, as shown by the results of the MTT assay. The addition of GO decreases the cell viability but keeps the scaffolds still biocompatible, and adding both DOX and GO to the FHA/PLA scaffolds has a negative impact on cell viability because DOX and GO remain toxic at the given percentages. (c) 2025 Society of Chemical Industry.en
dc.description.urihttps://doi.org/10.1002/pi.6743
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/pi.6743
dc.identifier.eissn1097-0126
dc.identifier.endpage285
dc.identifier.issn0959-8103
dc.identifier.issue3
dc.identifier.startpage277
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14981/69243
dc.identifier.volume74
dc.identifier.wos001392089200001
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherWILEY
dc.relation.ispartofPOLYMER INTERNATIONAL
dc.subject3D printing
dc.subjectBiomaterials
dc.subjectDoxorubicin
dc.subjectFluorohydroxyapatite
dc.subjectGraphene oxide
dc.subjectPolylactic acid
dc.subjectScaffold
dc.subjectSUBSTITUTED HYDROXYAPATITE
dc.subjectMECHANICAL-PROPERTIES
dc.subjectPLA
dc.subjectRELEASE
dc.subjectHYDROGEL
dc.subjectBONE
dc.subjectCELLULOSE
dc.subjectCOATINGS
dc.subjectPolymer Science
dc.titleAnti-tumoural activity of 3D printed fluorohydroxyapatite-polylactic acid scaffolds combined with graphene oxide and doxorubicin
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.import.sourceWOS

Dosyalar

Koleksiyonlar