Yayın:
Modeling of the mass flow rate of natural gas flow stream using genetic/decision tree/kernel-based data-intelligent approaches

dc.contributor.authorDayev, Zhanat
dc.contributor.authorYetilmezsoy, Kaan
dc.contributor.authorSihag, Parveen
dc.contributor.authorBahramian, Majid
dc.contributor.authorKiyan, Emel
dc.date.accessioned2026-06-27T14:50:57Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.description.abstractThe large consumption of natural gas, one of the most important energy sources in the world, necessitates reliable, precise, and accurate calculation of gas flow rate and amount in order to use this resource in an efficient and sustainable way. The present computational study investigates the possibilities of several soft-computing strategies in estimating the mass flow rate of natural gas flow stream (kg/h) (output variable) based on four input variables of orifice plate diameter ratio, differential pressure of orifice plate (kPa), operating pressure of the natural gas (bar), and operating temperature of the natural gas (degrees C). A genotype/phenotype genetic algorithm (gene expression programming (GEP) technique), two decision tree-based methods (random forest (RF), random tree (RT) models), and two kernel-based approaches (Gaussian process regression (GPR) and support vector machines (SVM) methods) were applied for the first time to predict gas mass flow rate. Coefficient of correlation (CC), mean absolute error (MAE), root mean square error (RMSE), Scattering index (SI), Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE), and mean absolute relative error (MARE) were computed as the statistical performance evaluators to determine of the best-performing soft-computing approach. The performance assessment indices corroborated the superiority of the Pearson VII universal kernel function-based GPR model (GPR-PUKF) model (CC = 0.9997, MAE = 64.8091 kg/h, RMSE = 248.7584 kg/h, SI = 0.0237, and NSE = 0.9993 for the testing dataset) over other data-intelligent models in predicting the gas mass flow rate. In addition, statistical results revealed that the predictions of the RF method were better than those of the GEP-and RT-based models, but the GEP approach showed the lowest performance among all applied models. Although the CC values of all models were satis-factory (>0.993), the percentile deviation of GPR model (1.7325%) from the actual values showed competitive lower values, indicating its superior performance than other models (GEP = 15.1436%, RF = 6.5403%, RT = 9.5576%, and SVM = 3.2107%). This study highlighted the significance of employing advanced soft-computing approaches in determining the mass flow rate of natural gas, a vital source of energy, as well as its value to the gas sector.en
dc.description.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.flowmeasinst.2023.102331
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.flowmeasinst.2023.102331
dc.identifier.eissn1873-6998
dc.identifier.issn0955-5986
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14981/65511
dc.identifier.volume90
dc.identifier.wos000926783600001
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherELSEVIER SCI LTD
dc.relation.ispartofFLOW MEASUREMENT AND INSTRUMENTATION
dc.subjectDecision tree
dc.subjectDifferential pressure method
dc.subjectGas flow rate
dc.subjectRandom forest
dc.subjectSoft -computing
dc.subjectGAUSSIAN-PROCESSES
dc.subjectEngineering
dc.subjectInstruments & Instrumentation
dc.titleModeling of the mass flow rate of natural gas flow stream using genetic/decision tree/kernel-based data-intelligent approaches
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.import.sourceWOS

Dosyalar

Koleksiyonlar