Yayın:
Comparison of bacteria-based autonomous and autogenous healing performances of geopolymer mortar exposed to sulfate attack

dc.contributor.authorTanyildizi, Harun
dc.contributor.authorZiada, Mahmoud
dc.contributor.authorUysal, Mucteba
dc.contributor.authorCoskun, Ahmet
dc.date.accessioned2026-06-27T15:20:42Z
dc.date.issued2025
dc.description.abstractIn this study, the performances of bacteria-based autogenous and autonomous healing of metakaolin, red mud, and colemanite-based geopolymer mortar exposed to sulfate attack were compared. The red mud and colemanite in geopolymer mortar mixtures were used at 0%, 6%, and 4% of metakaolin by weight. Bacteria-free samples for autonomous healing and bacteria-containing samples for autogenous healing were produced. S. pasteurii was used as the bacteria in this study. Then, these specimens were exposed to sulfate attack for periods of 1, 2, 3, 6, and 12 months. After the samples were exposed to sulfate attack, the autogenous and autonomous healing process was carried out. In the healing process, a solution containing 9 x 108 cells/ml bacteria (Bac-media) was injected into the cracks with a syringe to heal the geopolymer mortar samples. The mass change, length change, compressive strength, ultrasonic pulse velocity, flexural strength, and capillary water absorption tests of autonomous and autogenous healing geopolymer mortar samples were performed. Also, SEM/EDS, FTIR, Micro-computed tomography (Micro CT), and XRD were carried out for microstructure analysis. This study found that the mechanical properties of autonomous healing samples were higher than those of autogenous healing samples. Also, Micro-CT analysis found that 98.51% of the total porosity of the geopolymer mortar exposed to the sulfate attack was filled with CaCO3 precipitated by using S. pasteurii. These results provide an effective method for the recovery of geopolymer composites subjected to durability effects such as sulfate attack.en
dc.description.sponsorshipTrkiye Bilimsel ve Teknolojik Arascedil
dc.description.sponsorshiptimath
dc.description.sponsorshiprma Kurumu [119M063]
dc.description.urihttps://doi.org/10.1002/suco.70204
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/suco.70204
dc.identifier.eissn1751-7648
dc.identifier.endpage6905
dc.identifier.issn1464-4177
dc.identifier.issue6
dc.identifier.startpage6879
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14981/69985
dc.identifier.volume26
dc.identifier.wos001511963500001
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherWILEY
dc.relation.ispartofSTRUCTURAL CONCRETE
dc.subjectautogenous healing
dc.subjectautonomous healing
dc.subjectcolemanite
dc.subjectgeopolymer mortar
dc.subjectmetakaolin
dc.subjectred mud
dc.subjectsulfate attack
dc.subjectFLY-ASH
dc.subjectCARBONATE PRECIPITATION
dc.subjectMECHANICAL-PROPERTIES
dc.subjectCONCRETE
dc.subjectRESISTANCE
dc.subjectDURABILITY
dc.subjectADMIXTURES
dc.subjectSTRENGTH
dc.subjectConstruction & Building Technology
dc.subjectEngineering
dc.titleComparison of bacteria-based autonomous and autogenous healing performances of geopolymer mortar exposed to sulfate attack
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.import.sourceWOS

Dosyalar

Koleksiyonlar