Yayın:
Comparison of the biomechanical effect of distal implants placed at different angles in the all-on-four technique: A nonlinear finite element analysis

dc.contributor.authorUnuvar, Yildiz
dc.contributor.authorCalis, Aylin
dc.contributor.authorKoc, Osman
dc.date.accessioned2026-06-27T15:20:34Z
dc.date.issued2025
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: The All-on-four technique addresses this by placing two vertical implants in the anterior region and two posterior implants angled up to 45 degrees. This study evaluates stress distribution on bone, implants, abutments, gingiva, and prostheses based on posterior implant angulation, using both standard and angled neck implants. Additionally, angled neck implants were used alongside standard implants. Methods: To evaluate the biomechanical stress and displacement behavior of implants placed at 15 degrees, 30 degrees, 45 degrees, and 30 degrees neck-angled in the interforaminal region of using the All-on-four technique, under a 200 N masticatory force on bone, implant, abutment, and prosthesis, using the FEA method with a nonlinear solver. Results: The stress values measured in the neck region of the angled implant and abutment placed in the distal region were highest in model IV (305 and 420 MPa), followed model III (282 and 359 MPa), model II (192 and 337 MPa) and lowest in model I (177 and 225 MPa), respectively. The mean elemental von Mises stress in the mandibular bone region where the implant was placed was highest in model I (56 MPa) and lowest in model III (40.4 MPa). Conclusion: As the angle of insertion of the implant into the bone increases, the biomechanical stress value on the implant and abutment also increases. Among the models, the lowest von Mises stress values on the implant and abutment were measured in model I and model II. Models with low stress values can be recommended for patients with clinical conditions and biomechanical risk factors. (c) 2024 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights are reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.en
dc.description.sponsorshipEge University Scientific Research Projects Coordinatorship [25224]
dc.description.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jormas.2024.102157
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jormas.2024.102157
dc.identifier.eissn2468-7855
dc.identifier.issn2468-8509
dc.identifier.issue4
dc.identifier.pubmed39613258
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14981/69956
dc.identifier.volume126
dc.identifier.wos001554474100041
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherELSEVIER
dc.relation.ispartofJOURNAL OF STOMATOLOGY ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY
dc.rightsopenAccess
dc.subjectAll-on-four
dc.subjectNeck angled implant
dc.subjectStraight implant
dc.subjectMultiunit abutment
dc.subjectFinite element analysis
dc.subjectStress
dc.subjectPTERYGOMAXILLARY DISJUNCTION
dc.subjectSTRESS-DISTRIBUTION
dc.subjectEXPANSION
dc.subjectPATTERNS
dc.subjectSITES
dc.subjectDentistry, Oral Surgery & Medicine
dc.titleComparison of the biomechanical effect of distal implants placed at different angles in the all-on-four technique: A nonlinear finite element analysis
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.import.sourceWOS

Dosyalar

Koleksiyonlar