Yayın:
Thermal, structural and morphological characterization of dental polymers for clinical applications

dc.contributor.authorBenli, Merve
dc.contributor.authorGumus, Beril Eker
dc.contributor.authorKahraman, Yusuf
dc.contributor.authorYagci, Ozlem
dc.contributor.authorErdogan, Duygu
dc.contributor.authorHuck, Olivier
dc.contributor.authorOzcan, Mutlu
dc.date.accessioned2026-06-27T14:39:03Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.description.abstractPurpose: Polymers are used in dentistry on a daily basis due to their mechanical, functional and aesthetic properties. However, such biomaterials are subject to deterioration in the oral environment. Thus, this study aimed to evaluate the structural properties of live commonly used dental polymers to determine their best clinical indications. Methods: Four hundred-fitly samples of five dental polymers (polyethylenterephthalat - glycol modified (PG), polymethyl methacrylate (PA), ethylene vinyl acetate(E), polycarbonate (PC), polyetheretherketone (PK) were prepared to investigate their thermal, structural and chemical characteristics using energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS), Fourier transform infrared analysis(FTIR), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), differential scanning calorimetry(DSC), thermogravimetric analysis(TGA), X-ray difTraction(XRD), and Shore D hardness test. Data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA, Tukey's HSD, and Levene's tests (alpha=0.05). Results: PK (87.2) and PA (82.4) displayed the highest hardness values and smooth surfaces, as observed with SEM (p<0.001). Silica was detected in PK, PA. and E by EDS and XRD. The highest glass transition temperature was recorded for PC (145.00 +/- 2.00 degrees C) and PK (143.00 +/- 1.87 degrees C), while the lowest value was measured for E (50.00 +/- 2.12 degrees C)(p<0.001). The highest mass loss was detected for PG (91.40 +/- 1.40%) by TGA. Conclusions: PA and PK polymers can be used for stress-containing treatments due to their mechanical properties. These two materials are also advantageous in terms of plaque accumulation as these polymers reveal smoother surfaces than other groups. Insufficient physical and thermal properties require the use of F with caution and only in limited clinical indications.en
dc.description.urihttps://doi.org/10.2186/jpr.jpor_2019_534
dc.identifier.doi10.2186/jpr.jpor_2019_534
dc.identifier.eissn2212-4632
dc.identifier.endpage185
dc.identifier.issn1883-1958
dc.identifier.issue2
dc.identifier.pubmed32938878
dc.identifier.startpage176
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14981/63102
dc.identifier.volume65
dc.identifier.wos000668171300008
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherJAPAN PROSTHODONTIC SOC
dc.relation.ispartofJOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTIC RESEARCH
dc.rightsopenAccess
dc.subjectDental Polymer
dc.subjectFTIR
dc.subjectHardness
dc.subjectThermal Stability
dc.subjectTGA
dc.subjectXRD
dc.subjectMECHANICAL-PROPERTIES
dc.subjectELECTRICAL-PROPERTIES
dc.subjectSURFACE-ROUGHNESS
dc.subjectRESIN COMPOSITES
dc.subjectGRAPHENE OXIDE
dc.subjectPOLYETHERETHERKETONE
dc.subjectSTABILITY
dc.subjectFIBER
dc.subjectPEEK
dc.subjectDentistry, Oral Surgery & Medicine
dc.titleThermal, structural and morphological characterization of dental polymers for clinical applications
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.import.sourceWOS

Dosyalar

Koleksiyonlar