Yayın: Toward improved siting of wind-solar hybrid farms: A novel framework integrating multi-criteria decision making, machine learning-driven feature selection, and spatial clustering
| dc.contributor.author | Uguz, Yasin Ferit | |
| dc.contributor.author | Bilgili, Atakan | |
| dc.contributor.author | Uzar, Melis | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-06-27T15:30:29Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2026 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Ensuring secure, affordable, and sustainable energy supply is a growing global challenge as rising demand and supply insecurity accelerate the transition to renewable energy. Hybrid wind-solar systems offer an effective solution by exploiting spatial and temporal resource complementarity, but their deployment critically depends on reliable site selection. Most multi-criteria decision analysis studies rely on a single weighting method, apply limited criteria evaluation, lack statistical validation, and rarely identify spatially coherent, investment-ready zones. This study addresses these gaps by proposing an integrated geographic decision-making framework for hybrid wind-solar siting that combines two expert-based weighting methods, Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Best-Worst Method (BWM) with an objective, data-driven weighting method, CRiteria Importance Through Intercriteria Correlation (CRITIC) and machine learning-assisted criterion screening. The framework was applied to Izmir Province, T & uuml;rkiye. Suitability maps generated under alternative weighting methods were compared using spatially adjusted statistical tests, clustered into contiguous high-suitability zones using hierarchical density-based spatial clustering (HDBSCAN), converted into candidate-site polygons, and prioritized using the Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) and the Multi-Attributive Border Approximation Area Comparison (MABAC) method. The results revealed pronounced differences across weighting methods. Highly or very highly suitable areas accounted for 33.27% (AHP) and 27.75% (BWM) of candidate sites, compared with 58.39% under CRITIC. Validation using 703 existing solar photovoltaic and wind turbine installations showed agreement rates of 77.81%, 72.83%, and 83.65%, respectively. The resulting outputs provide actionable decision-support information for regional planning and the identification of investment-ready hybrid wind-solar zones. | en |
| dc.description.uri | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2026.127609 | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.apenergy.2026.127609 | |
| dc.identifier.eissn | 1872-9118 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 0306-2619 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14981/71320 | |
| dc.identifier.volume | 411 | |
| dc.identifier.wos | 001709985500001 | |
| dc.language.iso | eng | |
| dc.publisher | ELSEVIER SCI LTD | |
| dc.relation.ispartof | APPLIED ENERGY | |
| dc.rights | openAccess | |
| dc.subject | Hybrid energy site selection | |
| dc.subject | Geographic information systems | |
| dc.subject | Multi-criteria decision making | |
| dc.subject | Machine learning | |
| dc.subject | Feature selection | |
| dc.subject | Clustering | |
| dc.subject | ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS | |
| dc.subject | SITE SELECTION | |
| dc.subject | GIS | |
| dc.subject | MODEL | |
| dc.subject | AHP | |
| dc.subject | PERFORMANCE | |
| dc.subject | IMPACTS | |
| dc.subject | SYSTEM | |
| dc.subject | REGION | |
| dc.subject | Energy & Fuels | |
| dc.subject | Engineering | |
| dc.title | Toward improved siting of wind-solar hybrid farms: A novel framework integrating multi-criteria decision making, machine learning-driven feature selection, and spatial clustering | |
| dc.type | Article | |
| dspace.entity.type | Publication | |
| local.import.source | WOS |