Yayın:
Towards Cleaner Diesel Engines: Performance and Emission Characteristics of Diesel-Ammonia-Methanol Fuel Blends

dc.contributor.authorKocatepe, Onur
dc.contributor.authorGonca, Guven
dc.contributor.institutionauthorGONCA, Güven
dc.date.accessioned2026-06-27T15:30:23Z
dc.date.issued2026
dc.description.abstractDecarbonization of compression-ignition engines requires evaluation of carbon-free and low-carbon fuel alternatives. Ammonia (NH3) offers zero direct carbon emissions but faces combustion challenges including low flame speed (7 cm/s) and high auto-ignition temperature (657 degrees C). Methanol provides improved reactivity and bound oxygen content that can enhance ignition characteristics. This computational study investigates diesel-ammonia-methanol ternary fuel blends using validated three-dimensional CFD simulations (ANSYS Forte 2023 R2; ANSYS, Inc., Canonsburg, PA, USA) with merged chemical kinetic mechanisms (247 species, 2431 reactions). The model was validated against experimental in-cylinder pressure data with deviations below 5% on a single-cylinder diesel engine (510 cm3, 17.5:1 compression ratio, 1500 rpm). Ammonia energy ratios were systematically varied (10-50%) with methanol substitution levels (0-90%). Fuel preheating at 530 K was employed for high-alcohol compositions exhibiting ignition failure at standard temperature. Results demonstrate that peak cylinder pressures of 130-145 bar are achievable at 10-30% ammonia with M30K-M60K configurations, comparable to baseline diesel (140 bar). Indicated thermal efficiency reaches 38-42% at 30% ammonia-representing 5-8 percentage point improvements over diesel baseline (31%)-but declines to 30-32% at 50% ammonia due to fundamental combustion limitations. CO2 reductions scale approximately linearly with ammonia content: 35-55% at 30% ammonia and 75-78% at 50% ammonia. NOX emissions demonstrate 30-60% reductions at efficiency-optimal configurations. Multi-objective optimization analysis identifies the A30M60K configuration (30% ammonia, 60% methanol, 530 K preheating) as optimal, achieving 42% thermal efficiency, 58% CO2 reduction, 51% NOX reduction, and 11% power enhancement versus diesel. This configuration occupies the Pareto frontier knee point with cross-scenario robustness.en
dc.description.urihttps://doi.org/10.3390/pr14020298
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/pr14020298
dc.identifier.eissn2227-9717
dc.identifier.issue2
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14981/71295
dc.identifier.volume14
dc.identifier.wos001670412700001
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherMDPI
dc.relation.ispartofPROCESSES
dc.subjectammonia
dc.subjectmethanol
dc.subjectalternative fuels
dc.subjectCFD simulation
dc.subjectdiesel engine
dc.subjectemission control
dc.subjectthermal efficiency
dc.subjectmulti-objective optimization
dc.subjectOXIDATION
dc.subjectMECHANISM
dc.subjectEngineering
dc.titleTowards Cleaner Diesel Engines: Performance and Emission Characteristics of Diesel-Ammonia-Methanol Fuel Blends
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.import.sourceWOS

Dosyalar

Koleksiyonlar