Flexural Performance of Geopolymer-Based Composite Beams Under Different Curing Regimes

Abstract

Electrical curing is a viable alternative to traditional thermal curing for geopolymer materials due to its capability for rapid and internal geopolymerization. In this research, reinforced geopolymer-based composite beams were successfully fabricated at a macroscale using a binary system of fly ash (FA) and granulated blast furnace slag (GBFS). The mixture was activated with a solution of sodium silicate (Na2SiO3) and sodium hydroxide (NaOH) with a fixed molar ratio of 2:1 for both, and aggregate-to-binder and activator-to-binder (A/B) ratios of 2.5 and 0.7, respectively. To ensure electrical conductivity, individual fiber systems were employed, including carbon fiber (CF), steel fiber (SF), and waste wire erosion (WWE), each incorporated at a dosage of 0.5 vol.% of the total mix volume. In addition, carbon black (CB) was introduced as a conductive filler at a constant dosage of 2.0 vol.% of the binder content in selected specimens. Each beam specimen contained only one type of conductive reinforcement or filler. A total of twelve reinforced geopolymer-based composite beams with a 150 mm square section and a span of 1300 mm, with a clear span of 1200 mm, were successfully cast and reinforced based on reinforced concrete beam designs and standards, with a dominant goal of enhancing beam behavior under flexure. The beams were cured in ambient curing conditions, or using thermal curing at 80 degrees C for 24 h, and using electrical curing from the fresh states with a fixed voltage of 25 V. Notwithstanding a common beam size and reinforcement pattern, distinct curing methods significantly influenced beam structure properties. Peak loads were between 20.8 and 31.5 kN, initial stiffness between 1.75 and 6.09 kN/mm, and total energy absorption between 690 and 1550 kN/mm, with a post-peak energy component of between 0.12 and 0.55. Displacement-based ductility measures spanned from 3.2 to 8.1 units with a distinct improvement in electrical curing regimes, especially in the SF-reinforced specimens; this indicates that electrical curing in reinforced geopolymer composite materials works as a governing mechanism in performance rather than simply a method for enhancing the strength of materials.