Yayın:
BALANCED VS IMBALANCED TRAINING DATA: CLASSIFYING RAPIDEYE DATA WITH SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINES

dc.contributor.authorUstuner, M.
dc.contributor.authorSanli, F. B.
dc.contributor.authorAbdikan, S.
dc.date.accessioned2026-06-27T13:58:47Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.description.abstractThe accuracy of supervised image classification is highly dependent upon several factors such as the design of training set (sample selection, composition, purity and size), resolution of input imagery and landscape heterogeneity. The design of training set is still a challenging issue since the sensitivity of classifier algorithm at learning stage is different for the same dataset. In this paper, the classification of RapidEye imagery with balanced and imbalanced training data for mapping the crop types was addressed. Classification with imbalanced training data may result in low accuracy in some scenarios. Support Vector Machines (SVM), Maximum Likelihood (ML) and Artificial Neural Network (ANN) classifications were implemented here to classify the data. For evaluating the influence of the balanced and imbalanced training data on image classification algorithms, three different training datasets were created. Two different balanced datasets which have 70 and 100 pixels for each class of interest and one imbalanced dataset in which each class has different number of pixels were used in classification stage. Results demonstrate that ML and NN classifications are affected by imbalanced training data in resulting a reduction in accuracy (from 90.94% to 85.94% for ML and from 91.56% to 88.44% for NN) while SVM is not affected significantly (from 94.38% to 94.69%) and slightly improved. Our results highlighted that SVM is proven to be a very robust, consistent and effective classifier as it can perform very well under balanced and imbalanced training data situations. Furthermore, the training stage should be precisely and carefully designed for the need of adopted classifier.en
dc.description.urihttps://doi.org/10.5194/isprsarchives-xli-b7-379-2016
dc.identifier.doi10.5194/isprsarchives-xli-b7-379-2016
dc.identifier.endpage384
dc.identifier.issn2194-9034
dc.identifier.issueB7
dc.identifier.startpage379
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14981/56181
dc.identifier.volume41
dc.identifier.wos000393155900059
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherCOPERNICUS GESELLSCHAFT MBH
dc.relation.conference23rd Congress of the International-Society-for-Photogrammetry-and-Remote-Sensing (ISPRS)
dc.relation.ispartofXXIII ISPRS CONGRESS, COMMISSION VII
dc.rightsopenAccess
dc.subjectLand cover classification
dc.subjectImbalanced training data
dc.subjectSupport Vector Machines
dc.subjectRapidEye
dc.subjectAgriculture
dc.subjectLAND-COVER CLASSIFICATION
dc.subjectEXTREME-LEARNING-MACHINE
dc.subjectIMAGE CLASSIFICATION
dc.subjectNEURAL-NETWORK
dc.subjectFOREST
dc.subjectPERFORMANCE
dc.subjectAFRICA
dc.subjectCROP
dc.subjectPhysical Geography
dc.subjectRemote Sensing
dc.subjectImaging Science & Photographic Technology
dc.titleBALANCED VS IMBALANCED TRAINING DATA: CLASSIFYING RAPIDEYE DATA WITH SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINES
dc.typeProceedings Paper
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.import.sourceWOS

Dosyalar

Koleksiyonlar