Yayın:
Machine learning approach for GNSS geodetic velocity estimation

dc.contributor.authorOzarpaci, Seda
dc.contributor.authorKilic, Batuhan
dc.contributor.authorBayrak, Onur Can
dc.contributor.authorTaskiran, Murat
dc.contributor.authorDogan, Ugur
dc.contributor.authorFloyd, Michael
dc.date.accessioned2026-06-27T15:06:26Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.description.abstractThis study aimed to investigate the performance of machine learning (ML) algorithms in determining horizontal velocity at specific points using the current Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) velocity field. To achieve this objective, the analysis utilized the most comprehensive velocity field available for Turkey, where 70% of the GNSS velocities was allocated for training the ML algorithms, while the remaining 30% was used for testing. Contrary to the previous research, the significance of considering the tectonic structure within the study area was emphasized at this point. To determine the tectonic structure of the horizontal velocity field in the region, a preliminary clustering procedure was conducted. Subsequently, distinct ML algorithms were trained using velocity fields associated with different tectonic plates. Moreover, to investigate the impact of the tectonic domain, the entire velocity field was also tested using ML algorithms without considering the tectonic structure. Four different ML algorithms, namely, Gradient Boosting Machines (GBM), LightGBM, Random Forest (RF), and eXtreme Gradient Boosting Machines (XGBoost), were employed to estimate the horizontal velocities (east and north components). The findings imply that incorporating the tectonic structure improved the performance of machine learning predictions, as indicated by the GBM algorithm's decreased root-mean-square error values. In addition, when the tectonic structure was taken into account, the accuracy assessment values for the RF and XGBoost algorithms in the east component decreased significantly. In terms of predicting GNSS velocities, the RF algorithm exhibited the lowest root-mean-square error values compared to other algorithms. The horizontal velocity differences between averages of the reference velocity field and the RF velocity estimates are maximum 0.4 mm/yr.en
dc.description.sponsorshipYimath
dc.description.sponsorshipldimath
dc.description.sponsorshipz Technical University
dc.description.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10291-023-01607-1
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s10291-023-01607-1
dc.identifier.eissn1521-1886
dc.identifier.issn1080-5370
dc.identifier.issue2
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14981/68001
dc.identifier.volume28
dc.identifier.wos001148741700001
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherSPRINGER HEIDELBERG
dc.relation.ispartofGPS SOLUTIONS
dc.rightsopenAccess
dc.subjectClustering
dc.subjectGeodetic velocities
dc.subjectGNSS
dc.subjectMachine learning
dc.subjectRandom forest
dc.subjectGPS VELOCITIES
dc.subjectCONSTRAINTS
dc.subjectDYNAMICS
dc.subjectNETWORK
dc.subjectRemote Sensing
dc.titleMachine learning approach for GNSS geodetic velocity estimation
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.import.sourceWOS

Dosyalar

Koleksiyonlar