dc.description.abstract |
Deepfakes allow users to manipulate the identity of a person in a video or an image.
Previously, special hardware and skill were required to create such fake videos/images.
But together with improvements on GAN-based techniques, generating more realistic
and hard to detect manipulated faces became easier. This threatens individuals and
decreases trust in social media platforms. In this work, our goal is to report eight
different models’ learning ability on, by far, the largest fake face dataset - DFDC and
test the generalization ability of these models with Celeb-DF-v2. Because the training
dataset consists of high-quality videos, we started detecting and extracting faces from
them. Next, we sampled data to have balanced classes and a feasible amount of
data to train with limited resources. We started training with no extra augmentation
because the dataset was big enough, and faces were already modified. Next, we added
our default augmentation chain, inspired by other works and increased strength with
Coarse-Dropout and Grid Mask augmentations.
A separate test set from the DFDC dataset, which has unseen augmentations and
distractors and a completely different Celeb-DF-v2 dataset, was used to evaluate
results. As distinct from the train set, we followed different face extraction flow for
the test sets. We issued face tracking by using simple Intersection over the Union
and sampled faces that only tracked over a certain number of consecutive faces. For
each video in the test set, the confidence of the sampled faces averaged, and a single
confidence value was generated. To calculate video-based log loss values, we used
this confidence values. For the Celeb-DF-v2 dataset, we also calculated Sensitivity
and Specificity values. For these metrics, the optimal threshold was decided by
using Equal Error Rate. We concluded that despite the relatively smaller size input
EfficientNet-B4 model has the best learning and generalization ability. Training models
with half-precision may speed up training time up to 2 times with very few losses.
Finally, Coarse Dropout helped models to generalize better. |
en_US |